"There is no metalanguage" (LACAN),
No more than "extraterritorial" !
It is because speech testifies to significance while echoing the structure of the subject, that it contains and conveys the fundamental negation which opposes any metalanguage pretending to suture the incompleteness proper to the symbolic. The symbolism supports this specific dialectical articulation of Moebianity to associate with the other two dimensions : The imaginary and the real, without which it would not retain its particularity or its raison d'être. Invoke topology and suggest that it could make up for this structural incompleteness, ("Causal Béance" Lacan) amounts to denouncing and denying the unconscious as it radically opposed any xenopathy and excludes this "hommosexuality" which rejects femininity induced by paternal function. Such a perverse project is to cursed the "half" and "slander" of the saying which defends any promise of suture of the irreducible gap between the signifier and the signified. The signifier area implies wanderings that testify to the irrevocable absence of any "extra-territoriality" among "speaking beings", (cf. The "errors" that Fernand Deligny works with certain autistic and psychotic children), by no means reducible to their only ethnic and/or denominational membership that feeds paranoia and debility, Sources of fatal and deadly mistakes. These wanderings in the symbolic field are all the more fruitful since they come up against the insurmountable limits as the signifier imposes as they are essential to configure different reals which all translate an impossibility : that of being overdue and transgressed, Even if it is in the form of pathologies seriously affected the structure of the subject.
The theoretical ineptus that represents the use of a degraded topology in "metalanguage", seriously prejudice to analytical discourse and perverts the practice that it determines and supports. The topology cannot definitively stop the errors caused by ontological predication, whose presence is constant and necessary to create the conditions favorable to its obviousness. Or, the latter, as a process, It is only possible by the means that speech offers to adult another discourse whose main contribution consists in the enhancement of the significance as it is based precisely on this incompleteness of the symbolism. This significance is induced by the saying which is erased in the objectification that it generates, And stay that, But not without effects however. It remains implicitly active behind any extension objectification and can prevent the objectification process from damaging in a psychotic reification, hermetically refractory to any aspherical dialectic, Despite the more or less convincing effects of "troops" caused by the anchoring in the symbolic order.
Does what is fundamentally emerging from the structure of the subject and which induces an elusive knowledge in itself, but apprehendable by its effects, Is it "soluble" in a knowledge pretending to master this knowledge resulting from the dependence of the signifier ? The asphanic dialectic that this dependence can bring comes from the "half-said" that the signifying articulation implies and offers as the only way of access to the discount of saying "which remains forgotten behind what is said in what is heard" (LACAN), Thus escapeing everything claiming to master it by explicitly or implicitly advocating the exclusion of the unconscious as it ensures the success of what escapes and thus supports the existence of all speaking.
All the proclamations that invoke knowledge, in particular the one who claims to be science to suture the inherent gap in the moebianity of the articulation between RSI, want to be "progressive". But very often, They end up joining irresponsibility which consists in flouting the structure of the subject, explicitly or implicitly targeted as the major obstacle to the completeness of everyone, whose freedom and sovereignty must consist in freeing itself from this "defect" that is symbolic castration, inherent in the status of "parlêtre". The Beave which is at the foundation of the latter, echoes and resonates with the signifier as it imposes itself at the same time as the "murder of the thing" to mobilize "the death drive", necessary for existence, now largely subtracted to the order of nature thanks to the symbolic order which subverts it by giving a vacuum an indisputable functional value. But the latter can only be uncovered and evidenced by the moment which claims to fill it, reveals elements which refer to it and which call for an obviously what contains it and enclose it. By explaining it and bringing it to light from the effects it produces, what claimed to suture it degrades and dissolves, promoting the adverse new meanings. They reveal that they proceed and support themselves of the "non-report" whose obscure aggravates the intellectual inhibition which contributes to strengthening points of view authorized by spherical knowledge, of the scholastic type, academic and institutionalized.
The "non-report", established by "the murder of the thing", ensures the substitute by the signifier of the final absence of it, which is now represented in a metaphorical way without however its entire or its entirety is restored. This "non-report" establishes the "half-said" and induces a "internal exclusion report" which obvious to any "extraterritoriality". He promotes the "out of point of view" by confirming decisive and irreversible inscription in the symbolic order, the consequences of which inevitably collide with the reason of the ego. Predicative quests whose spherical character is increasingly asserted, especially if the socio-political context allows it by putting them in competition, are less and less conducive and favorable to their obviousness. In such a context, It is a safe bet that the symptoms which the predicative knowledge put in the spotlight by a society reappear, at some point in the evolution of social relationships it generates, have strong aggravations as well as an increasingly disabling iatrogenic chronicization.
The gap, emptiness or gap, caused by the disappearance of the essence of things inherent in their appointment, give a solid consistency to what is therefore presented as an impossibility and an intransgressible prohibition, and that, Despite the imaginary rapes that are not lacking or keep, Beyond moral and social imperatives. This forbidden underpins "the discord" and gives negation a power whose positivity leads to an ethics whose radicality is unshakable. So, The relationships between "having and being" are now determined and weighted by this void which directs them towards a subversive and heterodox route : The "natural" or "original" ontology imagined by "being" in the form of an indisputable data, ultimately reveals faults that the quests "to have", in the form of various objective lusts, end up showing that they are unable to fill them and suture them due to an essential and insurmountable impossibility, which has the merit of preserving desire. This impossibility is the force of structural law, and recalls the omnipresence of "non-report", congruent of "the object a". So, "Have it", against the background of a lack of object that compromises imaginary completeness, motivates any objective relationship that, Even if she engages love, ends up stopping on failures recalling the "non-report". They release illusions that nourishment and other object prostheses nourish, intended to fill the lack and obscure the object a, "Cause of desire".
Dominant ideologies are growing in madness, that is to say to irresponsibility, In all ignorance of the cause, Under fallacious pretexts dictated by the ontological imperatives shared by so -called progressive conceptions with other more frankly reactionary ideologies. Socio-historic, as shown by the latest work of Johann Chapoutot ("The irresponsible". Grasset.2025), The collusion of liberal-authoritarian "centrists" and the worst Nazi reactionaries was able to take place in Germany before the start of the Second World War, and the filthy "final solution". These kinds of coalitions can be repeated again in these fatal years of 2024 /25 where "madness", consequent of irresponsibility, rage !
Preparation for the surge of death is insidious and pernicious : under the guise of humanism, many speeches – apparently opposed, even antagonic- don't want to know anything about the subject. They are announcing death that some (es) prefer the fault which supports existence and refers to symbolic castration inherent in the dependence of the signifier and to the definitive anchoring in the symbolic order. Relying on the latter becomes in my opinion a necessity to fight and defeat the hegemonic mode of production which corrupts the whole planet by advocating, with increasingly fascist drifts, Megalomaniac hypertrophy of all those who do not suffer the structure of the subject and the dimension of the structural impossibility that it brings into play to radically oppose "madness" summarized in my words in these terms : Rather death than death drive and castration inherent in the incompleteness of the symbolism !
This is the current watchword, widespread by a number of "irresponsible" all over the world, Especially since their "madness" is supported by scientific predication which helps them "concrete" extension fictions (S2) and cleave them or dissociate them from the intension (S1), On which they depend and which inevitably refers them to the unconscious and its concrete exhaust, workforce and substantial.
If analytical discourse requires radicality, It is that which consists in taking into account the S2 from which the meeting with S1DENDSED POSSIBLE : The joint of the intension with extensions is made effective thanks to the "flaw" (at work with the object a) which constitutes the latter and comes from their dependence on the signifier. La « compactification » (LACAN) This structural defect is in fact used to consolidate the stalling of a protected existence against "madness". It implies a radicality which constantly affirms the negation proper to the unconscious as it constantly reconstructs psychic reality from this specific dialectic which ties the extensions and the intension between them, Without these relieving it, Even if they tend to forget it and ignore it. This dialectic has the particularity of preserving the void which ensures the operation of continuing (coastline) Between what is distinct (locally) And what is fundamentally identical (globally). It concretizes aspirity while undoubtedly establishing the dimension of the impossibility which underlies and nourishes the incompleteness due to the dependence of the signifier to which the speech refers relentlessly. Therefore, This aspirity is in no way an immediate data, brought by knowledge whatever it is, placed under the domination of the bilateral reason (spherical). It proceeds from a work of deconstruction of the sphericity which tends to repress it or to the inner, but which she carries the marks anyway, As long as we give the opportunity to speeches that do not want to know anything to offer their developments as they promote step by step its more explicit highlight. It is on the basis of this theoretical consideration that I hear the famous Freudian formula : «Where it was, Should I become ", translated by Lacan : "Where it was, Should I happen " !
Topology and speech in no way transcend the primacy of the signifier and its consequences. Both reflect, with different representations and configurations, of the same foundation which inevitably refers to the symbolic order and its incompleteness, source of progress. Their structure, Based on signifying logic, rejects any idealization which emerges rather from the illusions that the imagination sets up, thus defying the signifier which determines them in the last instance and confronts them with the real, whose unacceptable impossibility of being controlled or "dhiberate" is materialized by manifest effects which present its exhaust and confirm the incompleteness of the symbolism.
The heterodoxy brought by analytical discourse, lies in highlighting and explaining the relationships between this incompleteness and what gives consistency to the exhaust. "Faille compactification" (LACAN) which incomplete and enriches at the same time characterizes the structure of the subject as it is marked by a defect necessary for existence, which defect articulates the desire to a prohibition which persists, Despite all the possible and imaginable transgressions that predicative ideologies encourage speech that refers to language and highlights the signifier allows the prohibition, under the essential negation which echoes the incompleteness of the symbolism, to acquire a status which makes it invulnerable to the various transgressions, to the point that he defeats what claims to put it down. Even "heavy" pathologies, Deposit of choice of subjective positions , inevitably dependent on the subject's structure, cannot overcome. Do not displease those who, Like Fréderic Lordon and Sandra Lucbert in their work entitled "Pulse" (Discovery. 2025), believe they promote a "materialist psychoanalysis" by unscrewing "motorism" (LACAN) that characterizes it, To give us a genetic psychology in the end, exclusive of the unconscious in the Freudian sense. By delusional the different pathologies of the relationships they have with the structure of the subject, And not taking into account the choices of subjective positions in connection with the "non-report", These two authors bog in an ontology that rejects the paradoxical logic that the aspirical moebianity mobilizes. So, by excluding temporality based on "presentation of absence", Only the chronology is privileged, and the "logical time" which refers to the structure of the subject is completely ousted. Also, Psychosis – In reference to the work of Félix Guattari- cannot represent a form of opposition to the capitalist system and a modality of fighting oppressive and segregative institutions that this mode of production develops in a society, based on science and everything that favors the bilateral reason. Submission to this spherical logic commands the ontological quest, considerably infers the allegedly progressive scope of such theoretical constructions, showing little consideration for significance. So, The central impulse concept is misguided and overused because of its disturbance and its disarticulation with the "non-report" that promotes and constantly asserts the unconscious as it is the main name. In my opinion, The challenge of "non-report" is equivalent to that of the unconscious, Whatever the theoretical contortions of the spherical type to which can be devoted.
The ontological project, said "progressive", proposed in this work which explicitly refers to psychoanalysis, flies the structure of analytical discourse as Lacan has formalized it, and ends at the end of the race by decrying the unconscious, By reducing the Freudian work to a social psychology hostile to all the negations induced by the latter. The dependence of each speaking being (and everyone) to the symbolic order -Definite and characterized by its incompleteness, Source of essential impositivity, But not exclusive of predication- is excluded in favor of psychological conceptions whose spherical logic claims to guarantee an unfailing ontology. As for recursion, which ensures the dialectic between predication and impositivity, According to the logical principle of one step without the other, and vice versa, She seems totally foreign to these kinds of theoretical conceptions. Heterodoxy that she promotes, proves to be incompatible with objectives considered to be progressive because they convey another predication for just as ontological, which would be shared by the majority of the masses, sensitive to their more humanist content. Or, By maintaining them in an ignorance of the unconscious, Certainly more "comfortable", She encloses them dangerously in a spherical or bilateral reason, Always large of deadly drifts. Pretend to "tame" the unconscious because it is the vector of the constitutive flaw of the subject, amounts to strengthening corporate alienation to the detriment of signifying alienation which supports the subjective structure.
Psychopathological disorders can offer the opportunity to get rid of this spherical reason and to open new perspectives to intelligence (Reading between lines) that arouses "docte ignorance", advocated by Lacan to support the analytical task which does not propose to cure "the incompleteness of the symbolic" and of all its existential consequences. "Psychopathologies" constitute the different possible metaphorizations that everyone is led to build to integrate or exclude -in the different degrees and modalities- The "non-report", founder of the subject structure. Manage to admit and recognize the impact of the subject -, sometimes intense- It is finally accepting that he is himself the metaphor of this non-report, If necessary for existence. Recursion is only possible if the impositivity, based on the negation specific to the unconscious, is brought into play thanks to the work of obviously that allow fictional extensions constitutive of a design which cannot do without the signifier and its logic, which beats any ontological claim : no subject (unconscious) unaccompanied ! Sinon, It is the singularity which "trinque" and the perversion of the illusory group unit which triumphs and relegates "unarity" (LACAN) forbidden. Social alienation then takes precedence over the meaningful alienation that it keeps ignoring while flouting the singularity, based on the sharing of the incompleteness of the symbolic. The separation, Building on alienation, ensures the production of metaphors that do not exhaust metonymy resulting from what "the signifier cannot (impossibility) mean itself ". This impossibility makes link and ensures the signifying articulation so that complementarity, consisting in using another signifier, does not bring any completeness. It confirms the essential incompleteness and leaves open all the possibilities that can highlight it.
Ontological sphericity, supported by extension productions, is then deeply altered by the logic of the signifier which, By bringing to light, introduces a negative logic, all the more fruitful as it allows to pose in new terms the problem of the relationship between knowledge and truth. The "non-report" defeats any object fetishization and enriches drive satisfaction by articulating it to the object A which, because he causes desire, releases the impulses of the grip of fantasy, which tends to push for transgressions in order to challenge, even to defeat the negation of the unconscious at work in the prohibition and the law of desire. The very one that transcends all social laws, which prove to be incapable of constraining and dominating it, Even if they subject him to a number of distortions from their own logics and reasons, In order to exclude the unconscious as it refers to a refractory otherness to dominant xenopathy. This reaches its climax when it generates unparalleled cowardice which actually rejects otherness linked to the unconscious and produces a self-hatred whose resolution is in an imaginary group identification, of nationalist and/or ethno-confessional type.
Confusion between signifying alienation and social alienation, even due to the rejection of the other and the bar he wears, is then at his height ! Also, Does the existential stake summarize to make a choice of subjective position allowing to clarify the relationships between these two alienations and the place granted to the other within them. In other words, How to preserve the incompleteness of the symbolic by registering in social relationships that tend to disqualify it as a "tare". The Freudian Castration concept is perverted, and the symbolic order is swallowed to the rank of unbearable limit ("Castrating") which hinders the powers of autonomy and sovereignty of everyone. The categorical imperative then relates to the efforts to be made to get rid of it to achieve its "being". Therefore, Humanism, based on "the other barred", that is to say on the negation brought into play by the specific otherness specific to the unconscious, proves fundamentally different from that conveyed by predicative conceptions, Engoned in an ontology of bad aloi. They keep challenging analytical discourse, Even if she lets an increase that she is inspired by.
In the area of the unconscious, No speaking being is foreign to the dependence of the signifier or to belonging to the symbolic order. Certainly, Some manifestations may arouse "disturbing strangeness", But it is linked to the errors caused by the transgressions of the unconscious, at the forefront of which appears the exclusion of desire. Based on object A which supports the "downgrading" or the "disgusting" of objects that take, Thanks to the fantasy, an argic value, Desire is in a way the essential witness of "non-report". The dissipation of the acute dazzling of objects, Can support the deconstruction and dismissal of institutions that develop knowledge that does not want to know anything about this object has as it is at the source of inevitable but "obvious" fictions.
The resistances implemented, to oppose any obviously taking into account the significance, come from group "coagulations", united by the rejection of the emptiness common to all "speaking beings", and therefore, by hatred dedicated to the negation inherent in the unconscious as it promotes the signifier of the lack in the other (the other crossed out of the subject). The degrading erosion of this negation is pathognomonic of speeches which "demonize" otherness by dissociating it from the unconscious in order to make a predication of an improperly "liberated" predication which founds it and determines it in the last instance. The subject of the unconscious supports the "out of point of view" by constantly maintaining significance, so that no predicativo-nontological theory manages to exhaust it, Whatever the pretensions and the pretexts that it can highlight so that the group aggregation denies "the collective (that) is nothing, that the subject of the individual " (LACAN). By challenging "unarity", Imaginary group unity mobilizes a love that defies and defeats "the a-mur" (LACAN), At the risk of eradicating singularity as it represents particular modes of expression and sharing of the commune "incompleteness of the symbolic" : "The knowledge that knows of the Un-Bewusst, goes to die " / Une-Bevier's failure, It’s love ” (LACAN).
Amen Hadj-Mouri
31/01/25
"There is no metalanguage" (LACAN),
No more than "extraterritorial" !
It is because speech testifies to significance while echoing the structure of the subject, that it contains and conveys the fundamental negation which opposes any metalanguage pretending to suture the incompleteness proper to the symbolic. The symbolism supports this specific dialectical articulation of Moebianity to associate with the other two dimensions : The imaginary and the real, without which it would not retain its particularity or its raison d'être. Invoke topology and suggest that it could make up for this structural incompleteness, ("Causal Béance" Lacan) amounts to denouncing and denying the unconscious as it radically opposed any xenopathy and excludes this "hommosexuality" which rejects femininity induced by paternal function. Such a perverse project is to cursed the "half" and "slander" of the saying which defends any promise of suture of the irreducible gap between the signifier and the signified. The signifier area implies wanderings that testify to the irrevocable absence of any "extra-territoriality" among "speaking beings", (cf. The "errors" that Fernand Deligny works with certain autistic and psychotic children), by no means reducible to their only ethnic and/or denominational membership that feeds paranoia and debility, Sources of fatal and deadly mistakes. These wanderings in the symbolic field are all the more fruitful since they come up against the insurmountable limits as the signifier imposes as they are essential to configure different reals which all translate an impossibility : that of being overdue and transgressed, Even if it is in the form of pathologies seriously affected the structure of the subject.
The theoretical ineptus that represents the use of a degraded topology in "metalanguage", seriously prejudice to analytical discourse and perverts the practice that it determines and supports. The topology cannot definitively stop the errors caused by ontological predication, whose presence is constant and necessary to create the conditions favorable to its obviousness. Or, the latter, as a process, It is only possible by the means that speech offers to adult another discourse whose main contribution consists in the enhancement of the significance as it is based precisely on this incompleteness of the symbolism. This significance is induced by the saying which is erased in the objectification that it generates, And stay that, But not without effects however. It remains implicitly active behind any extension objectification and can prevent the objectification process from damaging in a psychotic reification, hermetically refractory to any aspherical dialectic, Despite the more or less convincing effects of "troops" caused by the anchoring in the symbolic order.
Does what is fundamentally emerging from the structure of the subject and which induces an elusive knowledge in itself, but apprehendable by its effects, Is it "soluble" in a knowledge pretending to master this knowledge resulting from the dependence of the signifier ? The asphanic dialectic that this dependence can bring comes from the "half-said" that the signifying articulation implies and offers as the only way of access to the discount of saying "which remains forgotten behind what is said in what is heard" (LACAN), Thus escapeing everything claiming to master it by explicitly or implicitly advocating the exclusion of the unconscious as it ensures the success of what escapes and thus supports the existence of all speaking.
All the proclamations that invoke knowledge, in particular the one who claims to be science to suture the inherent gap in the moebianity of the articulation between RSI, want to be "progressive". But very often, They end up joining irresponsibility which consists in flouting the structure of the subject, explicitly or implicitly targeted as the major obstacle to the completeness of everyone, whose freedom and sovereignty must consist in freeing itself from this "defect" that is symbolic castration, inherent in the status of "parlêtre". The Beave which is at the foundation of the latter, echoes and resonates with the signifier as it imposes itself at the same time as the "murder of the thing" to mobilize "the death drive", necessary for existence, now largely subtracted to the order of nature thanks to the symbolic order which subverts it by giving a vacuum an indisputable functional value. But the latter can only be uncovered and evidenced by the moment which claims to fill it, reveals elements which refer to it and which call for an obviously what contains it and enclose it. By explaining it and bringing it to light from the effects it produces, what claimed to suture it degrades and dissolves, promoting the adverse new meanings. They reveal that they proceed and support themselves of the "non-report" whose obscure aggravates the intellectual inhibition which contributes to strengthening points of view authorized by spherical knowledge, of the scholastic type, academic and institutionalized.
The "non-report", established by "the murder of the thing", ensures the substitute by the signifier of the final absence of it, which is now represented in a metaphorical way without however its entire or its entirety is restored. This "non-report" establishes the "half-said" and induces a "internal exclusion report" which obvious to any "extraterritoriality". He promotes the "out of point of view" by confirming decisive and irreversible inscription in the symbolic order, the consequences of which inevitably collide with the reason of the ego. Predicative quests whose spherical character is increasingly asserted, especially if the socio-political context allows it by putting them in competition, are less and less conducive and favorable to their obviousness. In such a context, It is a safe bet that the symptoms which the predicative knowledge put in the spotlight by a society reappear, at some point in the evolution of social relationships it generates, have strong aggravations as well as an increasingly disabling iatrogenic chronicization.
The gap, emptiness or gap, caused by the disappearance of the essence of things inherent in their appointment, give a solid consistency to what is therefore presented as an impossibility and an intransgressible prohibition, and that, Despite the imaginary rapes that are not lacking or keep, Beyond moral and social imperatives. This forbidden underpins "the discord" and gives negation a power whose positivity leads to an ethics whose radicality is unshakable. So, The relationships between "having and being" are now determined and weighted by this void which directs them towards a subversive and heterodox route : The "natural" or "original" ontology imagined by "being" in the form of an indisputable data, ultimately reveals faults that the quests "to have", in the form of various objective lusts, end up showing that they are unable to fill them and suture them due to an essential and insurmountable impossibility, which has the merit of preserving desire. This impossibility is the force of structural law, and recalls the omnipresence of "non-report", congruent of "the object a". So, "Have it", against the background of a lack of object that compromises imaginary completeness, motivates any objective relationship that, Even if she engages love, ends up stopping on failures recalling the "non-report". They release illusions that nourishment and other object prostheses nourish, intended to fill the lack and obscure the object a, "Cause of desire".
Dominant ideologies are growing in madness, that is to say to irresponsibility, In all ignorance of the cause, Under fallacious pretexts dictated by the ontological imperatives shared by so -called progressive conceptions with other more frankly reactionary ideologies. Socio-historic, as shown by the latest work of Johann Chapoutot ("The irresponsible". Grasset.2025), The collusion of liberal-authoritarian "centrists" and the worst Nazi reactionaries was able to take place in Germany before the start of the Second World War, and the filthy "final solution". These kinds of coalitions can be repeated again in these fatal years of 2024 /25 where "madness", consequent of irresponsibility, rage !
Preparation for the surge of death is insidious and pernicious : under the guise of humanism, many speeches – apparently opposed, even antagonic- don't want to know anything about the subject. They are announcing death that some (es) prefer the fault which supports existence and refers to symbolic castration inherent in the dependence of the signifier and to the definitive anchoring in the symbolic order. Relying on the latter becomes in my opinion a necessity to fight and defeat the hegemonic mode of production which corrupts the whole planet by advocating, with increasingly fascist drifts, Megalomaniac hypertrophy of all those who do not suffer the structure of the subject and the dimension of the structural impossibility that it brings into play to radically oppose "madness" summarized in my words in these terms : Rather death than death drive and castration inherent in the incompleteness of the symbolism !
This is the current watchword, widespread by a number of "irresponsible" all over the world, Especially since their "madness" is supported by scientific predication which helps them "concrete" extension fictions (S2) and cleave them or dissociate them from the intension (S1), On which they depend and which inevitably refers them to the unconscious and its concrete exhaust, workforce and substantial.
If analytical discourse requires radicality, It is that which consists in taking into account the S2 from which the meeting with S1DENDSED POSSIBLE : The joint of the intension with extensions is made effective thanks to the "flaw" (at work with the object a) which constitutes the latter and comes from their dependence on the signifier. La « compactification » (LACAN) This structural defect is in fact used to consolidate the stalling of a protected existence against "madness". It implies a radicality which constantly affirms the negation proper to the unconscious as it constantly reconstructs psychic reality from this specific dialectic which ties the extensions and the intension between them, Without these relieving it, Even if they tend to forget it and ignore it. This dialectic has the particularity of preserving the void which ensures the operation of continuing (coastline) Between what is distinct (locally) And what is fundamentally identical (globally). It concretizes aspirity while undoubtedly establishing the dimension of the impossibility which underlies and nourishes the incompleteness due to the dependence of the signifier to which the speech refers relentlessly. Therefore, This aspirity is in no way an immediate data, brought by knowledge whatever it is, placed under the domination of the bilateral reason (spherical). It proceeds from a work of deconstruction of the sphericity which tends to repress it or to the inner, but which she carries the marks anyway, As long as we give the opportunity to speeches that do not want to know anything to offer their developments as they promote step by step its more explicit highlight. It is on the basis of this theoretical consideration that I hear the famous Freudian formula : «Where it was, Should I become ", translated by Lacan : "Where it was, Should I happen " !
Topology and speech in no way transcend the primacy of the signifier and its consequences. Both reflect, with different representations and configurations, of the same foundation which inevitably refers to the symbolic order and its incompleteness, source of progress. Their structure, Based on signifying logic, rejects any idealization which emerges rather from the illusions that the imagination sets up, thus defying the signifier which determines them in the last instance and confronts them with the real, whose unacceptable impossibility of being controlled or "dhiberate" is materialized by manifest effects which present its exhaust and confirm the incompleteness of the symbolism.
The heterodoxy brought by analytical discourse, lies in highlighting and explaining the relationships between this incompleteness and what gives consistency to the exhaust. "Faille compactification" (LACAN) which incomplete and enriches at the same time characterizes the structure of the subject as it is marked by a defect necessary for existence, which defect articulates the desire to a prohibition which persists, Despite all the possible and imaginable transgressions that predicative ideologies encourage speech that refers to language and highlights the signifier allows the prohibition, under the essential negation which echoes the incompleteness of the symbolism, to acquire a status which makes it invulnerable to the various transgressions, to the point that he defeats what claims to put it down. Even "heavy" pathologies, Deposit of choice of subjective positions , inevitably dependent on the subject's structure, cannot overcome. Do not displease those who, Like Fréderic Lordon and Sandra Lucbert in their work entitled "Pulse" (Discovery. 2025), believe they promote a "materialist psychoanalysis" by unscrewing "motorism" (LACAN) that characterizes it, To give us a genetic psychology in the end, exclusive of the unconscious in the Freudian sense. By delusional the different pathologies of the relationships they have with the structure of the subject, And not taking into account the choices of subjective positions in connection with the "non-report", These two authors bog in an ontology that rejects the paradoxical logic that the aspirical moebianity mobilizes. So, by excluding temporality based on "presentation of absence", Only the chronology is privileged, and the "logical time" which refers to the structure of the subject is completely ousted. Also, Psychosis – In reference to the work of Félix Guattari- cannot represent a form of opposition to the capitalist system and a modality of fighting oppressive and segregative institutions that this mode of production develops in a society, based on science and everything that favors the bilateral reason. Submission to this spherical logic commands the ontological quest, considerably infers the allegedly progressive scope of such theoretical constructions, showing little consideration for significance. So, The central impulse concept is misguided and overused because of its disturbance and its disarticulation with the "non-report" that promotes and constantly asserts the unconscious as it is the main name. In my opinion, The challenge of "non-report" is equivalent to that of the unconscious, Whatever the theoretical contortions of the spherical type to which can be devoted.
The ontological project, said "progressive", proposed in this work which explicitly refers to psychoanalysis, flies the structure of analytical discourse as Lacan has formalized it, and ends at the end of the race by decrying the unconscious, By reducing the Freudian work to a social psychology hostile to all the negations induced by the latter. The dependence of each speaking being (and everyone) to the symbolic order -Definite and characterized by its incompleteness, Source of essential impositivity, But not exclusive of predication- is excluded in favor of psychological conceptions whose spherical logic claims to guarantee an unfailing ontology. As for recursion, which ensures the dialectic between predication and impositivity, According to the logical principle of one step without the other, and vice versa, She seems totally foreign to these kinds of theoretical conceptions. Heterodoxy that she promotes, proves to be incompatible with objectives considered to be progressive because they convey another predication for just as ontological, which would be shared by the majority of the masses, sensitive to their more humanist content. Or, By maintaining them in an ignorance of the unconscious, Certainly more "comfortable", She encloses them dangerously in a spherical or bilateral reason, Always large of deadly drifts. Pretend to "tame" the unconscious because it is the vector of the constitutive flaw of the subject, amounts to strengthening corporate alienation to the detriment of signifying alienation which supports the subjective structure.
Psychopathological disorders can offer the opportunity to get rid of this spherical reason and to open new perspectives to intelligence (Reading between lines) that arouses "docte ignorance", advocated by Lacan to support the analytical task which does not propose to cure "the incompleteness of the symbolic" and of all its existential consequences. "Psychopathologies" constitute the different possible metaphorizations that everyone is led to build to integrate or exclude -in the different degrees and modalities- The "non-report", founder of the subject structure. Manage to admit and recognize the impact of the subject -, sometimes intense- It is finally accepting that he is himself the metaphor of this non-report, If necessary for existence. Recursion is only possible if the impositivity, based on the negation specific to the unconscious, is brought into play thanks to the work of obviously that allow fictional extensions constitutive of a design which cannot do without the signifier and its logic, which beats any ontological claim : no subject (unconscious) unaccompanied ! Sinon, It is the singularity which "trinque" and the perversion of the illusory group unit which triumphs and relegates "unarity" (LACAN) forbidden. Social alienation then takes precedence over the meaningful alienation that it keeps ignoring while flouting the singularity, based on the sharing of the incompleteness of the symbolic. The separation, Building on alienation, ensures the production of metaphors that do not exhaust metonymy resulting from what "the signifier cannot (impossibility) mean itself ". This impossibility makes link and ensures the signifying articulation so that complementarity, consisting in using another signifier, does not bring any completeness. It confirms the essential incompleteness and leaves open all the possibilities that can highlight it.
Ontological sphericity, supported by extension productions, is then deeply altered by the logic of the signifier which, By bringing to light, introduces a negative logic, all the more fruitful as it allows to pose in new terms the problem of the relationship between knowledge and truth. The "non-report" defeats any object fetishization and enriches drive satisfaction by articulating it to the object A which, because he causes desire, releases the impulses of the grip of fantasy, which tends to push for transgressions in order to challenge, even to defeat the negation of the unconscious at work in the prohibition and the law of desire. The very one that transcends all social laws, which prove to be incapable of constraining and dominating it, Even if they subject him to a number of distortions from their own logics and reasons, In order to exclude the unconscious as it refers to a refractory otherness to dominant xenopathy. This reaches its climax when it generates unparalleled cowardice which actually rejects otherness linked to the unconscious and produces a self-hatred whose resolution is in an imaginary group identification, of nationalist and/or ethno-confessional type.
Confusion between signifying alienation and social alienation, even due to the rejection of the other and the bar he wears, is then at his height ! Also, Does the existential stake summarize to make a choice of subjective position allowing to clarify the relationships between these two alienations and the place granted to the other within them. In other words, How to preserve the incompleteness of the symbolic by registering in social relationships that tend to disqualify it as a "tare". The Freudian Castration concept is perverted, and the symbolic order is swallowed to the rank of unbearable limit ("Castrating") which hinders the powers of autonomy and sovereignty of everyone. The categorical imperative then relates to the efforts to be made to get rid of it to achieve its "being". Therefore, Humanism, based on "the other barred", that is to say on the negation brought into play by the specific otherness specific to the unconscious, proves fundamentally different from that conveyed by predicative conceptions, Engoned in an ontology of bad aloi. They keep challenging analytical discourse, Even if she lets an increase that she is inspired by.
In the area of the unconscious, No speaking being is foreign to the dependence of the signifier or to belonging to the symbolic order. Certainly, Some manifestations may arouse "disturbing strangeness", But it is linked to the errors caused by the transgressions of the unconscious, at the forefront of which appears the exclusion of desire. Based on object A which supports the "downgrading" or the "disgusting" of objects that take, Thanks to the fantasy, an argic value, Desire is in a way the essential witness of "non-report". The dissipation of the acute dazzling of objects, Can support the deconstruction and dismissal of institutions that develop knowledge that does not want to know anything about this object has as it is at the source of inevitable but "obvious" fictions.
The resistances implemented, to oppose any obviously taking into account the significance, come from group "coagulations", united by the rejection of the emptiness common to all "speaking beings", and therefore, by hatred dedicated to the negation inherent in the unconscious as it promotes the signifier of the lack in the other (the other crossed out of the subject). The degrading erosion of this negation is pathognomonic of speeches which "demonize" otherness by dissociating it from the unconscious in order to make a predication of an improperly "liberated" predication which founds it and determines it in the last instance. The subject of the unconscious supports the "out of point of view" by constantly maintaining significance, so that no predicativo-nontological theory manages to exhaust it, Whatever the pretensions and the pretexts that it can highlight so that the group aggregation denies "the collective (that) is nothing, that the subject of the individual " (LACAN). By challenging "unarity", Imaginary group unity mobilizes a love that defies and defeats "the a-mur" (LACAN), At the risk of eradicating singularity as it represents particular modes of expression and sharing of the commune "incompleteness of the symbolic" : "The knowledge that knows of the Un-Bewusst, goes to die " / Une-Bevier's failure, It’s love ” (LACAN).
Amen Hadj-Mouri
31/01/25
