Place du Jew in the world - and shawl for shawl
Since the first destruction of the temple, otherwise before before, The Jew does not/no more shelter. And he hardly has any seats. It is therefore the object a world. It is both taken for the waste of it and validated as its AGALMA, Either this shine that we grant to the Jews, and already in other monotheisms. But such a shine must not, brilliant and throwing all her lights, imply that these fires are shots, Cannon blows, or other fatal bursts, by drones, missiles ... in a way I refer here to Object chips by François Baudry. It is true that the Jew is exploded - and not only in the diaspora.[1]
Am I entitled to carry such a concept of psychoanalysis (the object a) au social, to politics, to destruction, to genocides,… ?
I consider that - if so - we make the Jew playing the role of closing the opening of the world, or openness to the world, And this under variable pretexts. This is therefore what he is accused of. To have-collectively it is, Hence the notion itself a priori destructive of "collective responsibility" - killed God, either to prevent the phallic function as a signifying opening of the world. The Jew presented as a enjoyer is thus the impediment of enjoying. We forget (It’s a political choice) to "normalize". Yet it is also crossed politics contradictions, that is to say of the sphere policy.
Despite everything we take the Jews each of a room (currency : Reminder of the usurier and therefore what is the wear, but Us not abnormal, said the saying), It is not without consequence on the enjoyment : It would be necessary to stick to a fruition in its good use, that is to say by avoiding abuse. But can there be an extra span without abuse ? Should we really stick to the moderation advocated by theEthics in Nicomaque ?
So the Jew is, lui aussi, depressed - and from there crossed like any subject -, we even want to make it the paradigm of this cut to which we still want to avoid (perversement) go to (This avoidance is the opposite of said father-version, who is founding and in no way perverse[2] - Enamoté Foundation of Primordial narcissism, Father function and joint phallic function, either the hollowed out seat of any subject). Also, including taken en masse, Jews are not all identical to the image that the ideology of a new alliance wants to give them : and Israel, comme ailleurs, left and right clash, Hence the flight forward in the war and the virtual genocide even if it denied, by which a certain "fascism" founded of religious finds a renewed existence[3]. And said left has little success in Israel, Especially since the media, at least in France, do not distribute its options. It’s actually as elsewhere in the world : Chine, Russia, USA, pays d’Europe, Latin America - it is dominant capitalism that implies this authoritarianism, let's say (See Kojève), which deletes any choice and mouth the topic of the subject just like, in the image that we want to ideologically give this one (as, upside down, Man would be in the image of God, and the Son of God, Son of man, is himself an image, absolutely), No social split is accepted. And the image of the Jew - responsible for the misfortunes of the world - mouth the productive oppositions, Operating tensions, by evacuating it himself, this Jew, and radically in Nazi crematories. This reminder does not justify anything of the news, But is surely not to omit or even to obliterate by perverse images and properly ready to wear.
A few years ago, glabrous and in particular bald, for reasons of chemotherapy, I wore chechias to cover my skull (A kippah did not hold). I was friends with my baker (original) Algerian(it is). I understand that Jeremiah Richir-apart from his logico-political reasons-bears the keffieh : the Talit gadol is not worn outside the synagogue, je veux dire : prayer. The talit katan is otherwise discreet. The fringes involve braids of which, both fringes and nodes (QUIPUS INCAS, or oceanian strings) have memorization value of what is not always (even still not) écrit. A relationship to writing is anyway here in action.
The fringes (tsitsit, fringe or braid) each bear five knots. Reminder of the sanctification of each, in particular by the blessing to recite (B'rakha). The knots of the fringes count more than the shawl itself, would I say.
To which I add that the object a remains masked by these stories of shawls and knots. Does this mean that the Jew advances masked ? (However, we are not in The awakening of spring.) That it is masked again implies bypassing this opposition between the open and the closed by a brand. History has always used such a brand, Including in the Middle East, in the use of this or that headgear. Thus conical yellow hat to ball, Past of Germany in Italy. And this since the Lateran Council (1215). The infamous brand (and designating Jews and wizards) was returned by rabbis in a distinctive signifying sign - from there the passage of the kippah in the liturgy. (Catholics peeling off in a church.) Hat, rolle or yellow star were the indexes of segregation sometimes returned in favor (?) Jews - in all cases to avoid mixed marriages. So all this presents itself against a backdrop of sexuality and enjoyment split into phallic enjoyment and enjoyment of the other, Lust and Unpleasant. And our discussions are themselves marked.
[1] See The outbreak, conference 2020, on the bursting of the universe of discourse and The outbreak (II) the 25-26 January 2026.
[2] Freud, in his text on theIch split, opposes the cleavage between obligation and prohibition (drive satisfaction and castration threat) and its bypass, This time perverse, by a fetish that makes link.
[3] For once this flight forward is perverse and the effect of an imaginary facticity leading to a real facticity.
